
Subsection (f) now reads: "All matches in pool, consolation,
quarter finals and bronze medal play, shall be two (2) out of three (3)
sets. Championship semi-finals and
finals shall be three (3) out of five (5)
sets."
Change to read either "All matches in pool,
consolation and quarter finals, shall be two (2) out of three (3) sets.
Championship semi-finals, finals and bronze medal games shall be three (3) out
of five (5) sets."
Or, "All matches, including semi
finals, bronze medal game and finals, shall be two (2) out of three (3)
sets."
Rationale: To make the semi final and final rounds consistent.
1. Officers and Duties
Reference:
Article IV, Section 2, d), (a), (b)
Amended
(a) Add: Alternate election year with CBA Rep.
(b).Add: Alternate election year with CGA Rep.
Cynthia Sutton
(Sir James Dunn) – Bob Gawalko (Sec/Treasurer) Action: CARRIED
Rationale: I was asked to write this motion from the
NOSSA 2003 meeting. It takes a few
years to fully understand the workings and operation of OFSAA Committees for
Girls and Boys Activities. If the elections are held in alternate years a new
Rep will have the experience of the other Rep to help with the new position.
2.
School Classifications
Reference: Article VII, Section 7, Pages 9 and 10
BIRT in Article VII, Section 7: School
Classifications be deleted and that the new Section 7
read as follows:
a)
All
schools within NOSSA shall be classified according to school population numbers
(taken as full time equivalent enrolment numbers – FTE numbers) from Oct 31st
of the previous school year. This
number shall be used to classify the member schools. These classification category numbers are:
“A” 1
– 600
“AA” 601
– 950
“AAA” 951+
b)
To
determine classification of all-male or all-female schools (public or private),
they shall
multiply their enrolment by 2 and then use this
number as its classification.
The following Additional Guidelines may be used by the Association when
classifying schools.
These may be used for each school as a whole and by sport
after Association has place a school in
its classification category outline in
a).
i)
Location of School
-
The
location of a school could allow an Association to shift the classification of
the school in either direction. For
example, a large school in an isolated area may be moved to a lower
classification category.
-
consideration
of urban vs. rural advantages and disadvantages
ii)
School
Composition
-
Program
focus may require a shift of a school from one classification to another (i.e.
collegiate
vs.
composite).
-
Schools
with a residential component have definite benefits and may warrant a shift to
a higher
classification category.
-
High
performance sport schools should be considered for a shift to a higher
classification
category.
iii)
Team
Composition
-
Any
of the following may create a shift of a school in a specific sport to a higher
classification
category: majority of team playing in outside
league, Provincial team players, National team
members.
iv)
Competition
-
Consideration
should be given to shifting teams to a higher classification category if the
team
plays out-of-season, or plays an exceptional number
of games.
-
School
teams playing in two leagues at the same time should be shifted to a higher
category.
v)
OFSAA
Success
-
Regular
medallists at any level of OFSAA competition should be shifted to a higher
classification category.
vi)
General
-
The
Association may only shift a school one level below what their student
population
numbers designate.
-
Schools
may be shifted up any number of classifications if several of the above
guidelines
apply to a specific school or to a specific sport
within a school.
-
a
school may participate in only one school classification of competition in any
one sport during
a school year.
vii)
Appeal
process
-
An
appeal process shall be in place which allows schools to appeal the placement
of their
school/team in a specific classification by the Association to the OFSAA
Classification
Committee. The appeal must come
through the Association and shall include an outline of the
rationale for the Association’s decision, and the school’s rationale for
their appeal. Appeals
must be
resolved by May 15th of the current school year so as to be
effective for the next
school
year.
Tim Lowe (Algonquin) – Lorie
Tremblay (Algonquin) Action:
CARRIED
Rationale:
To follow the same criteria as OFSAA constitution with regards to
classification.
3.
Duties of Convenors
Amended
BIRT Article VIII, Section 3, a) & b) under
OFSAA Championships be deleted.
Tim Lowe
(Algonquin) – Lorie Tremblay (Algonquin) Action:
CARRIED
Rationale:
It has become irrelevant
4.
Expenses for the Annual
Meeting
BIRT in Article IX, Section 5, Expenses for Annual Meeting in
b) Expenses
will be paid at the following rates:
i)
Transportation
WITHIN NOSSA – 23 cents per return km …… be changed
to read:
“Within NOSSA
– 30 cents per return km.”
Tim Lowe (Algonquin) – Lorie
Tremblay (Algonquin) Action:
CARRIED
Rationale: To reflect the rising cost of fuel in the
North. (This is the same as OFSAA Board
and Committee members)
5. Age Divisions
Reference: Article VII, Section 6, b), Page 9
Amended
NOSSA to adopt a two year
Junior Age division (16 & under) for all sports except
Track and Field and X-Country.
Clyde Sheppard, Bob Pilon ACTION:
DEFEATED
Rationale: Many other regions have adopted this age classification. This discrepancy is evident
at invitational tournaments particularly
in basketball and volleyball.
The existing age divisions at NOSSA are
causing a number of our athletes to “walk the hall”
in grade 11. Once they sit out
of a team sport they do not get back in.
In individual sports we
found a heavy concentration in the
senior division and a light concentration in junior.
Top athletes in team and individual
sports go senior as soon as possible since senior is the only
venue to OFSAA. The slow maturing athlete (physical) is out
of athletics too soon and has little
incentive to stay with athletics.
Many of our athletes are staying for
five years and getting the “heart of education”. One year of
midget, one year of junior and “3” years
of senior is not balanced.
Midget sports are organized to get the
athlete hooked. Junior had 2 years of competition to earn
rights and pay dues, and should not be a
reap of midget results.
6.
AD HOC COMMITTEE – School Classification
BIRT an ad hoc committee be formed to review school
classifications for the purpose of NOSSA competition.
And be it further resolved that this committee meet
during the 2004-2005 season with its membership formed by this Association. The
committee will be comprised of 4 to 6 people representing all 4 districts.
Denis Gauthier
(Lasalle), Lorie Tremblay (Algonquin) ACTION: CARRIED
1. Badminton
Reference: Judges, Page 2
Delete: “The NOSSA Convenor shall designate a
service judge for each locale to deal with
problems arising
from illegal serves.”
Add: The NOSSA Badminton convenor will have a
pre-competition meeting with all
coaches
to go over: a) Lets
b)
Choose a Referee-in-chief and a referee per site from those in attendance at the competition (or designate them in the
NOSSA package)
c) Review uniform regulations
d)
Discuss post season meeting that will take place after
the NOSSA awards presentation.
Bob Pilon, Peter
Hocking ACTION:
CARRIED
2. Track and Field
Reference: Awards, Page 30
Change first sentence to read: “The top
individual in each event (including relays) will receive the NOSSA medallion,
and ribbons will be given to the second through eighth places, inclusive.”
Delete second sentence. Rest of
paragraph remains unchanged.
Irene Bisson (ESMC) – Karin
Augenstein (LCS) Action: CARRIED
Rationale: Coincides
with OFSAA.
3. Track and Field
That the Girls’ Open Pole Vault event be
changed to read “Girls’ Junior” and “Girls Senior” pole vault.
Luc Giroux (CND) – Dave Makela (EMC) Action: CARRIED
Rationale: Coincides with OFSAA.
4. Track and Field
Reference: General, 7 a), 8d), height of
sprint hurdles. 1500 Open Girls’ Steeplechase
Whereas, OFSAA has altered the height of sprint hurdles, the weight implements of discus, shot, and javelin and the addition of 1500m Open Girls’ Steeplechase.
BIRT NOSSA adopt the changes as per
OFSAA report to NOSSA Delegates
(see below)
Page 27 – Shot Put – 4 kg - Midget Boys, Junior Boys, All Girls’ Events
5.443 kg - Senior Boys
Discus – 1kg – Midget Boys, Junior Boys, All Girls’ Events
1.61 kg – Senior Boys
Javelin - 600 g – Midget Boys, Junior Boys, All Girls’ Events
800 g – Senior Boys
Page 32 – Track Event Schedule
1500m Open Girls Steeplechase - barrier will be 30”.
Sprint Hurdles - the Senior Boys’ height will go from 39” to 36”,
- the Junior Boys’ distance will go from 110 to 100 metres.
Page 35 – Field Event Schedule Event 83 – Midget, Junior Senior Pole Vault
The Track Referee will not have the right to overturn the starter’s decisions with regard to false starts.
Tim Lowe
(Algonquin) Dave Makela (Sudbury)
Action: CARRIED
5. Track and Field
Reference: Track and Field Awards, Page 31
BIRT the un-named NOSSA Boys’ and Girls’ Aggregate Trophy be named the
Bill Colcock Trophy.
Bev Holmes (Bawating) Michel
Chartrand (Algonquin) Action: TABLED to 2005
Rationale: Bill started cross-country running and coached distance track and field events for 40 years. He donated many trophies anonymously and would never permit one to be named after him and suggested this be done now.
1. Boys’ Basketball
Revise to read: "Teams from North Bay, North Shore,
Sault Ste. Marie and Sudbury must confirm their school classification for the
NOSSA Championship to the tournament convenor at least one week before the
District playoffs.
Denis Gauthier (LAS), Mitch Lalonde (LAS) Action:
CARRIED
Rationale: Makes the task of seeding much easier for the convenor if he
knows who has intentions to come to the NOSSA championship. Also, it puts
everyone on a level playing field.
2. Boys’ Basketball
Amended:
That the 'AA' NOSSA basketball championships revert back to the 2003-04
format.
John Basto (LCS) – Denis
Gauthier (LAS) Action: CARRIED
Rationale: This years format was simply not fair in
regards the amount of games played in one
day per team.

3. Boys’ Basketball
Reference: Boys
Midget Basketball "Series"
- add #6:
In the event that there are only three entries into the
tournament, a round robin competition will be played to decide the two teams
that will compete in the championship game.
In the event of a three-way tie after the round robin competition, the
two teams with the best "points for and against" record will advance
to the championship game. If there is a
tie for the second entry into the championship game, the team who was
victorious in the head to head competition will advance. All games shall be scheduled for a one day
competition."
Jean Duffus
(CVDCS) - Robert McIlvenna (CVDCS) Action:
CARRIED
4. Boys’ Basketball “A”
Rotation List for Midget
"A" Boys Basketball:
Whereas, the North
Shore and Sudbury Districts are the only two districts to have entries in the
"A" Division and the Sudbury District has hosted this tournament for
the last two years,
Be it resolved
that, the North Shore District host the NOSSA "A" Midget Boys' Basketball Tournament in the 2004-05
school year and that the hosting
of NOSSA "A" Boys' Midget Basketball Tournament then alternate
between the Sudbury and North Shore Districts thereafter on the 4 Year
Calendar.
Bob Ryan -
Duncan MacKenzie (CASS) Action:
CARRIED
Team
Championships:
Whereas, sometimes
there are two teams from one District who want to compete for a NOSSA
Championship and no teams from any other district,
Be it resolved
that, on the occasion when there are two teams from one District who
want to compete for a NOSSA championship and no teams from any other district,
these two teams be permitted to compete in a single head to head competition
for the NOSSA Championship. All costs
will be incurred by the teams involved in the competition. The District involved
will decide upon which team will host the game.
Duncan Mackenzie
(CASS) - John Rimore Action: CARRIED
6. Football
That the Sudbury District be included in the NOSSA Football schedule and further that Sudbury be included in the schedule rotation beginning in the Fall of 2004.
Kevin Ellsworth (CON) – Rob
Zanatta (SCC) Action: CARRIED
2004 NOSSA Football Proposal
2004 Sudbury at
Sault Bye North
Bay
2005 Sudbury at
North Bay Bye Sault
2006 North Bay at
Sault Bye Sudbury
2007 Sault at
Sudbury Bye North Bay
2008 North Bay at Sudbury Bye
Sault
2009 Sault at North Bay Bye Sudbury
Rationale
Sault
travelled in 2003 and our Boards budgets for every second year to travel
North Bay hosted 2003 and are prepared to travel to NOSSA.
Sudbury is new and we would expect them to travel before they
host.
Within this rotation no team would travel twice in one year.
7. FOOTBALL
Reference: Series, Page 8
BIRT the NOSSA Final Game be held on the Saturday one week
before the Central Bowl.
Barry Rushon
(White Pines), Richard Lachance (Northern) Action:
CARRIED
Elections: Robin Shamas (Sir James Dunn) - Secretary-Treasurer.
Laura Aubertin (Confederation) – OFSAA rep to Committee for
Girls’ Activities
1. Girls’ Basketball
That the “AAA” NOSSA Girls Basketball format return to a single elimination tournament, where first place plays fourth place and second place plays third place. The winners of both games would then play for the NOSSA Championship and the losers of both games would then play for the consolation championship.
Jenn Bourget
(LAS) – Mary Collinson (LAS) Action: DEFEATED
2. Girls’ Basketball (Tabled from 2003)
The N.O.S.S.A. structure for Junior and Senior Girls’ “AAA” Basketball return to a single
elimination format. This format would consist of two semi-final games and one championship
game for each division.
Rationale:
a)
The
current format creates situations where teams may play unbalanced schedules. For
example, two teams may play two games on Friday
night and only one game on Saturday versus the other teams that play one game
on Friday night and two games on Saturday.
b)
A
team’s regular season has no bearing on the seeding for the championship with
the current
format. As a result, two teams could play each other in their first round
game and then have to
turn around less than twenty-four
hours later and play again to determine the NOSSA
Champion.
Jen Bourget (LSS) - Ron Poulin (ESMC) Action: DEFEATED
3. Girls’ Basketball “AAA”
Reference:
Page 7 After ‘at the convenor’s discretion, Games 1 and 2 may be reversed.
Add: It is strongly suggested the teams
play a balanced schedule of two games Friday and the
Championship
game be played Saturday.
Millie WoodColton
(Lasalle) Action: CARRIED
4. Girls’ Hockey
Section (f) - change
length of period to read “three (3) 13-minute stop time periods”
Peter DeMarco
(LCS) – Michele Albert (CND) Action:
CARRIED
Rationale: In
the event of a single game championship, visiting teams are incurring the
expense of traveling on top of entry fee.
A longer game will make the expense a little more justified.
5. Girls’ Hockey
Reference: Rules and Officials, Page 26
Section (i) - overtime
Change first sentence to read: “In the event of a tie game at the end of
regulation time in playoffs, the CHA method for overtime will apply. If the ice time is not available to play
overtime, then the following procedure will be used ... “
Peter DeMarco (LCS) – Michele Albert
(CND) Action:
CARRIED
Rationale: Sufficient ice time
for the championship should be booked such that overtime may be decided at full
strength in a game situation rather than a shoot-out. This was
deemed to be the
more effective
6. CGA
Representative
BIRT NOSSA Girls’ committee accept that
the new CGA rep. for 2004-06 accompany
the 2004 CGA to the OFSAA June Assembly
and the costs incurred be covered by
NOSSA.
Lori Tremblay (Algonquin), John Wilson (St.
Joseph-Scollard Hall) CARRIED